No moosie there is no brainwashing of scholars and those who know the facts which you are not one. Israel good, Hamas, who by the way the Gazans voted into. Economics, Money and Debt. There is a place in KZN called Umhlab’uyalingana. And that one inclusion would, to you, make this testimony “jibe”? Given the documented history that this psychopathic torture and. The Crime Archives catalogues its serial killers by their number of proven hits. Some killers are suspected of much higher body counts. Others bragged about crimes. Welcome to my page of quotations about age, aging, and youth. Even though I've been collecting these since I was thirteen, I must admit that this page has grown quite. Get information, facts, and pictures about United States at Encyclopedia.com. Make research projects and school reports about United States easy with credible. The Avalon Project : Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 2. TWO HUNDREDAND SEVENTEENTH DAYMonday, 3. September 1. 94. 6Morning Session. THE PRESIDENT: The Judgment of the international Military Tribunal will now be read. I shall not read the title and the formal parts. JUDGMENT*On 8 August 1. Government of the United Kingdom, of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Government of the United States of America, the Provisional Government of the French Republic, and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics entered into an agreement establishing this Tribunal for the trial of War Criminals whose offenses have no particular geographical location. In accordance with Article 5, the following Governments of the United Nations have expressed their adherence to the Agreement: Greece, Denmark, Yugoslavia, the Netherlands, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Belgium, Ethiopia, Australia, Honduras, Norway, Panama, Luxembourg, Haiti, New Zealand, India, Venezuela, Uruguay, and Paraguay. By the Charter annexed to the Agreement, the constitution, jurisdiction and functions of the Tribunal were defined. The Tribunal was invested with power to try and punish persons who had committed Crimes against Peace, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity as defined in the Charter. The Charter also provided that at the trial of any individual member of any group or organization the Tribunal may declare (in connection with any act of which the individual may be convicted) that the group or organization of which the individual was a member was a criminal organization. In Berlin, on 1. 8 October 1. Article 1. 4 of the Charter, an indictment was lodged against the defendants named in the caption above, who had been designated by the- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- * Editor's Note. The Judgment is rendered verbatim as originally pronounced by the Tribunal. Later study has shown that in the translations of documents quoted several inaccuracies have occurred. For the benefit of students improved versions have been compiled in an appendix which will be found after the Judgment. References are given by small numbers in the text. Sept. 4. 6Committee of the Chief Prosecutors of the signatory Powers as major war criminals. A copy of the Indictment in the German language was served upon each defendant in custody at least 3. Trial opened. This Indictment charges the defendants with Crimes against Peace by the planning, preparation, initiation and waging of wars of aggression, which were also wars in violation of international treaties, agreements, and assurances, with War Crimes and with Crimes against Humanity. The defendants are also charged with participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit all these crimes. The Tribunal was further asked by the Prosecution to declare all the named groups or organizations to be criminal within the meaning of the Charter. The Defendant Robert Ley committed suicide in prison on 2. October 1. 94. 5. On 1. 5 November 1. Tribunal decided that the Defendant Gustav Krupp von Bohlen and Halbach could not then be tried because of his physical and mental condition, but that the charges against him in the Indictment should be retained for trial thereafter, if the physical and mental condition of the defendant should permit. On 1. 7 November 1. Tribunal decided to try the Defendant Bormann in his absence under the provisions of Article 1. Charter. After argument and consideration of full medical reports, and a statement from the defendant himself, the Tribunal decided on 1 December 1. Defendant Hess because of his mental condition. A similar decision was made in the case of the Defendant Streicher. In accordance with Articles 1. Charter, counsel were either chosen by the defendants in custody themselves, or at their request were appointed by the Tribunal. In his absence the Tribunal appointed counsel for the Defendant Bormann, and also assigned counsel to represent the named groups or organizations. The Trial, which was conducted in four languages- -English, Russian, French, and German- -began on 2. November 1. 94. 5, and pleas of . Thirty- three witnesses gave evidence orally for the Prosecution against the individual defendants, and 6. Defense. A further 1. Defense by means of written answers to interrogatories. Sept. 4. 6The Tribunal appointed Commissioners to hear evidence relating to the organizations, and 1. Defense before the Commissioners, and 1,8. Six reports were also submitted, summarizing the contents of a great number of further affidavits. Thirty- eight thousand affidavits, signed by 1. Political Leaders; 1. SS; 1. 0,0. 00 on behalf of the SA; 7,0. SD; 3,0. 00 on behalf of the General Staff and OKW; and 2,0. Gestapo. The Tribunal itself heard 2. The documents tendered in evidence for the prosecution of the individual defendants and the organizations numbered several thousands. A complete stenographic record of everything said in court has been made, as well as an electrical recording of all the proceedings. Copies of all the documents put in evidence by the Prosecution have been supplied to the Defense in the German language. The applications made by the defendants for the production of witnesses and documents raised serious problems in some instances, on account of the unsettled state of the country. It was also necessary to limit the number of witnesses to be called, in order to have an expeditious hearing, in accordance with Article 1. Charter. The Tribunal, after examination, granted all those applications which in their opinion were relevant to the defense of any defendant or named group or organization, and were not cumulative. Facilities were provided for obtaining those witnesses and documents, granted through the office of the General Secretary established by the Tribunal. Much of the evidence presented to the Tribunal on behalf of the Prosecution was documentary evidence, captured by the Allied armies in German army headquarters, Government buildings, and elsewhere. The case, therefore, against the defendants rests in a large measure on documents of their own making, the authenticity of which has not been challenged except in one or two cases. The Charter Provisions. The individual defendants are indicted under Article 6 of the Charter, which is as follows. The Tribunal established by the Agreement referred to in Article 1 hereof for the trial and punishment of. Sept. 4. 6the major war criminals of the European Axis countries shall have the power to try and punish persons who, acting in the interests of the European Axis countries, whether as individuals or as members of organizations, committed any of the following crimes. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill- treatment, or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill- treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity. The Tribunal will later discuss them in more detail; but, before doing so, it is necessary to review the facts. For the purpose of showing the background of the aggressive war and war crimes charged in the Indictment, the Tribunal will begin by reviewing some of the events that followed the first World War, and in particular, by tracing the growth of the Nazi Party under Hitler's leadership to a position of supreme power from which it controlled the destiny of the whole German people, and paved the way for the alleged commission of all the crimes charged against the defendants. Sept. 4. 6The Nazi Regime in Germany - - the Origin and Aims of the Nazi Party. On 5 January 1. 91. Armistice which ended the first World War, and 6 months before the signing of the peace treaties at Versailles, there came into being in Germany a small political party called the German Labor Party. On 1. 2 September 1. Adolf Hitler became a member of this party, and at the first public meeting held in Munich, on 2. February 1. 92. 0, he announced the Party's program. That program, whichremained unaltered until the Party was dissolved in 1. Tribunal is concerned. We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany, on the basis of the right of self- determination, of peoples. We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the peace treaties of Versailles and Saint Germain. We demand land and territory for the sustenance of our people, and the colonization of our surplus population. Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently, no Jew can be a member of the race... We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army. In a typical speech at Munich on 1. April 1. 92. 3, for, example, Hitler said with regard to the Treaty of Versailles. At its foundation our movement formulated three demands. Setting aside of the Peace Treaty. Unification of all Germans. Land and soil to feed our Nation. German Government; the demand for land was to be the justification for the acquisition of . In Mardi 1. 92. 3 the Defendant Goering was appointed head of the SA. The procedure within the Party was governed in the most absolute way by the . All, members of the Party swore an oath of . The 2. 5 points of the NSDAP program do not specifically mention the methods on which the leaders of the Party proposed to rely, but the history of the Nazi regime shows that Hitler and his followers were only prepared to negotiate on the terms that their demands were conceded, and that force would be used if they were not. On the night of 8 November 1. Putsch took place in Munich.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |